Bibliography or References
What is the difference between bibliography and references (list)?
My short answer is as follows:
Bibliography is the list of ALL DOCUMENTS you consulted for writing the essay/paper/dissertation or thesis.
However, you may only cited some of all documents you read/consulted. These cited documents are in your References.
Source: Australian National University (ANU) – Academic Skills & Learning Centre, Division of Student Services.
3 Comments
Post a comment
The Australian National University have got it wrong. If you would like clarification I can recommend Turabian’s ‘Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations.’
Basically, a reference list is given if the Harvard or Chicago reference style is used in the text and it can bear the title: References, Works Cited, Literature Cited or some variation as appropriate.
A bibliography is used mainly in nonscientific writing, especially in the humanities. It lists the sources used in writing the paper. Since a bibliography can never be inclusive of everything consulted in the writing it can more accurately be title: Selected Bibliography, Works Cited, or Sources Consulted. The MHRA Style Guide, which is used in the humanities, advises that ‘works not specifically referred to should not be included; if necessary, important items not cited in the main text could be mentioned in the introduction and therefore qualify for inclusion.’ You could also mention works for inclusion in the bibliography in a reasonable footnote.
So, basically, the difference is that ‘bibliographies’ are used in the humanities while ‘references’ are used in the sciences. Why? Because they use different referencing systems.
Thanks Jon. I found that explanation as well. However, many books and theses in humanities use references. 🙂
I must tell you that it’s hard to find your posts in google, i found this one
on 12 spot, you should build some quality backlinks in order to rank your webiste, i know how to help you, just type
in google – k2 seo tips and tricks